As mentioned the other day, they are not alone in this regard either, that being accelerating currency debasement policy. As a matter of fact, and contrary to claims by Goldman Sachs asserting the reason the dollar ($) will rally next year is because credit markets will be improving, the bailouts abroad are accelerating to the point money supply growth rates in the Eurozone are now outstripping those in the States as ‘the race to zero’ ratchets up a notch or five. This is why the $ is in rally mode, and also why gold should not suffer as much as bearish speculators think at present. You see they are all looking over the deflation cliff, but what they fail to realize is that authorities still have the hyperinflation card to play.

Some of you may be thinking the above ideas are ‘fine and dandy’, but with the reservation some empirical evidence to support this hypothesis would be better. And we could not agree more. So, we intend to do just that for you now, where the idea is to provide you with enough empirical evidence to make one feel comfortable about holding precious metals investments in coming weeks and months in spite of the fact deteriorating liquidity conditions and investor panic could erode prices considerably from current levels under the right conditions. What kind of conditions are we talking about? How about a good old fashioned panic, something we have not seen in quite some time as investors were lulled to sleep in this regard long ago with the protection of hedging related derivatives. Too bad these markets don’t work when the chips are down however, no?

Anyhow – and to the chase now, you may remember our article entitled The Need For Speed from earlier this year, where we first hinted at a contracting credit cycle, and that monetary debasement rates will need to accelerate at some point in the not too distance future in order to keep the USS Titanic afloat. Fast forward to today and here we are in exactly that situation, where monetary authorities are now debasing the currency at just shy of a 20-percent clip, and rising, in an ongoing effort to extend the larger credit cycle. And as alluded to above, there are numerous ways one can measure success in this regard, from currencies to asset bubbles, where to kick things off in terms of our examination of such variables, a look at the Swiss Franc is likely as good a place to start as any. Not talked about as often as it could be, as it stands today, the basic trading modus operandi behind movements in the Swissie is a function of perceptual pressure in the global economy’s pipe, where the mere hint of deflationary forces coming down the pike can cause it to back off in short order, as it’s doing right now. (See Figure 1)

And in looking above it’s not difficult to see that in fact technical conditions appear stretched to the upside and at a minimum in need of consolidation, which appears to be exactly what is happening, we hope. Because if this is not the case, where the count indicated is correct, then this could be a far more profound end to the rally in the Swissie (and possibly the larger credit cycle), at least on the basis of a more healthy global growth metric. Here, and as you can also see above, we are placing both gold and commodities ($CCI) in the same camp as the Franc considering the extremely tight correlation between the three, where again, reversals here would indicate the larger credit cycle is failing, and that present day currency mechanisms are beginning to reflect this condition in deflating asset prices.

So, the question then arises (and many an informed observer is asking this exact question right now), ‘is this the way it is – deflation right now – or is there more inflation yet to come?’ Answer: We know from our discussion above concerning official efforts to keep the money supply growing (which is happening by the way – but it’s the pace that needs to keep accelerating), that as long as monetary authorities have blood coursing through their veins, they will inflate or die. And in fact if history is a good guide, they should be successful at least one more time, perhaps as MZM growth rates search for the highs seen back in the mid 80’s, discussed in our opening. Of course you may remember prior to this we had a little problem in the stock market in the early 80’s that prompted such a response, with the big question here today being, ‘do we repeat in this respect as the final justification in going to light-speed in monetary debasement rates?’

This is a distinct possibility in my books, that being a short but sweet stock market scare, where as with the echo-bubble top back in 1937, the market peeled off 50-percent of it’s gains in approximately six-months. (See Figure 1) What’s different about today is it’s not likely World War III will come along formally to create the conditions (death and destruction) for another growth sequence like the one that’s ending now, but without a doubt some like George Bush and friends will try. Of course the absence of a formal world war will not stop monetary authorities from accelerating currency debasement rates either, not with all the $50,000 hammers and $50 million war-planes to pay for these days. So you see we don’t need a world war to spend this money. What we do need however is at least a few more years added to this commodity cycle if it is to match the 70’s experience, which as you can see below lasted approximately nine-years as opposed to the seven we have seen thus far in the current commodities bull market. (See Figure 2)

What’s more, in terms of the current commodities bull market it should also be noted that along with the time element being deficient on a comparative basis to previous cycles, prices would also be deficient in just reflecting past inflation if they stopped here as well, never mind the future. This can be seen below on a CRB plot adjusted by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which of course is deficient in its own right in terms of reflecting actual inflation / price increases over the past 30 to 40 years with official rates far removed from reality. That understood – it’s interesting to note we’re not even at the halfway point in terms of official price; and that if history is a good guide the next few years should see some quick catch-up in this respect. (See Figure 3)

So why are precious metals doing a terrible job of discounting such an outcome? This is a valid question considering for example the Gold / Crude Oil Ratio is much closer to historic lows than highs. In this respect it had better get going if it’s to signal higher prices down the road. And we expect this occur in coming days, even if nominal prices fade in coming months. As Einstein would say, ‘it’s in the relativity you know.’ So don’t be fooled by falling nominal prices in coming days, it’s the relativity that’s projecting future outcomes, where as long as gold is outperforming commodities, higher prices should ultimately be anticipated down the road. Thus, after a brief respite which could last as long as spring of next year possibly taking the Reuters/CRB Precious Metals Index (and gold) lower, I would also expect to see prices take off here first in discounting a return to pricing power as another wave of accelerating inflation takes hold. (See Figure 4)

And while some will see this as an election ploy, in actuality efforts to revive the economy should be seen on a higher level, where future attempts in this regard might not be so successful as Super-Cycle Degree forces continue to conspire in shaping conditions for Grand scale change. That is to say eventually considerations such as availability of increasingly scare resources (pertaining more to developing countries) and demographics (pertaining more to developed countries) are forecast to limit population growth, meaning the demand for increasing currency will wane both naturally and beyond the ability of bankers to circumvent via increasingly complex derivative schemes. In a nutshell, and unlike Einstein, they will simply be unable to split fiat currencies (derivatives) any further or manufacture sufficient new takers. Largely, this would be the reverse of both the ‘oil age’ and the US Dollar ($) empire fostered in carbon based technology.

Again however, these are considerations for the future, and views that are subject to change in measuring man’s ingenuity. That said, and in returning to the focus of today’s study, along with measuring the impact of past monetary policy on present and future commodity pricing, as purported above such realizations should first be witnessed in precious metals prices, gold first, followed by silver. What’s more, and contrary to the view a period of price weakness lies directly ahead signaled in ratio reversals across the equity complex discussed in our last meeting, it should be pointed out that if nominal precious metals pricing is to catch up to inflation adjusted values, this process should accelerate forthwith, not hesitate, which is the view most investors have today with all the deflationary forces coming down on the system at present. (See Figure 5)

As can be seen above for gold and below for silver, as inflation works its way into the larger system in official measure precious metals prices respond by rising, but that even back at the top of the 1980 cycle nominal pricing failed to capture real values, which is a condition still with us today. Of course it’s always been this way, as it’s the inflation that leads prices higher, even if official pricing measures (CPI) are flawed. That being known, at some point you would think the market should reflect even these flawed numbers, where again, in order to do so in terms of 1980 $’s, the nominal price would need rise to almost $2500, and silver $150. (See Figure 6)

So, the question arises ‘what’s holding this whole process back if monetary growth rates are accelerating higher, which of course is the definition of inflation?’ Well, for one thing officialdom attempts to have you believe their lying about actual price increase rates, as measured by CPI, is in everybody’s best interest. (i.e. this is of course better for the bureaucracy than the public.) Corresponding then they feel justified in publishing bogus pricing data, which in turn apparently keeps a lid on inflation expectations as institutional managers play the game. This is the way it’s been for some time now, living in our ‘Goldilocks economy’, but could it be that an outside factor like ‘peak oil’ comes along to prick our collective (monetary) bubble? Would crude oil at $200 finally create enough panic in the financial system to break precious metals free of paper pricing related constraints?

Without a doubt, and for one thing, it wouldn’t hurt to finally see the Gold / Crude Oil Ratio attached above move higher on a sustained basis, perhaps returning to historic highs after plumbing new lows recently. But if not this – what? You know what? It’s not important to know what factor(s) are going to prick our current monetary bubble. What is important to know however is it’s going to happen, and that it will likely occur in conjunction with a period of extremes in pricing such that the public finally awakes from slumber to realize ‘the system’ was not created to serve their needs, but to reward the ambitious and corrupt. This is when gold pricing will break away from management attempts to keep it ‘just right’ as per the ‘Goldilocks economy’. That’s when it will finally break above Grand Super-Cycle Degree sine resistance seen below. (See Figure 7)

As you can see above, such an attempt failed back in 1980 with aggressive restrictive monetary policy implemented by Paul Volcker’s Fed, but today, with all the deflationary forces to battle, Bernanke’s Fed has no such luxury, meaning at some point money supply growth should trip the light fantastic, sending gold above sine resistance, and causing a feeding frenzy as $ holders attempt to exit the system with as much of their savings possible. This is when gold (and silver) will break free of paper pricing constraints in my opinion, where in effect rising prices will not only be reflecting previous inflation, but the reality present day fiat currency regimes are poised to fail on an absolute basis, and that new anchored (to gold and possibly silver) specie will need be issued to facilitate international transactions at a minimum.

Is there more technical / empirical evidence this hypothesis holds water? Yes, in fact there is, where an inflation adjusted look at the stock market is suggestive at least one more (significant) nominal price rise should be witnessed before the current Super-Cycle Degree affair is complete. It’s either that or we will witness fifth-wave failure, and deflation Japanese style. This is of course coming no matter what stop-gaps are implemented by authorities because like the Japanese experience once you bubblize the real estate market the game is over. Americans are an ambitious and clever crowd however, so such realities will be postponed for as long as possible. (See Figure 8)

So, is that enough empirical evidence for you prices should continue higher in spite of all the risks out there? Such sentiment would be a bold call at the moment with credit market troubles continuing to hit the news services daily. You should be interested to know however that this is finally beginning to hit sentiment in the options market, where just over the past few days the absolute put / call ratio on the S&P 500 (SPX) has begun to rise again, now well over the 1.80 squeeze line at 1.83. (Notice futures are up this morning due to this, showing you the importance of this factor.) Add to this Dave’s observation from yesterday regarding the positive reversal on the weekly SPX, and without a doubt it appears something more robust than originally anticipated for the equity complex could be in store for us.

All it would take is for the yen to continue lower, signaling the carry trade is alive and well and the measured move to 1600ish on the SPX then becomes a distinct possibility, which would do a great deal to aid in helping gold and silver reverse all those bearish monthly candles from last month. Wouldn’t that be a kicker if last month’s bearish closes turned out to be more a function of sentiment than the reality of inflation? And all this could happen with a rising $ as long as the yen is declining. That’s all precious metals, commodities, and stocks want to see – they want to see that the carry trade is coming back into the market, where with this shift in US stock market sentiment a test of the lower structural support at 85 shown here in Figure 2 cannot be ruled out. For this reason then, and apologizing if this appears ‘wishy-washy’, we are returning our intermediate-term official outlook from bearish to neutral, and also upgrading our short-term outlook from neutral to bullish.

Furthermore, and although we will not be upgrading our official outlook on precious metals back to bullish in either the short or intermediate-term just yet because $ strength and tax-loss selling could hold prices back until year end, we have become much more open to a positive ‘January Effect’ for those issues being held back due to tax planning considerations now, with Novagold (NG:AMEX & TSX) at the top of this list all things considered. Personally I am buying at this point on this speculation, along with shares of Copper Canyon Resources (CPY:TXS-V) (to be added to the Precious Metals Portfolio at present prices) and Copper Fox Metals (CUU:TSX-V) which were both taken down hard in the wake of the Galore Creek announcement last week. If commodity prices improve into January, there’s no telling how well these stocks could recover from present levels once the pressure of tax-loss selling comes off.

This is all happening / changing quite fast I know, but this often happens at important pivots. Thus, we are maintaining an open mind with respect to Primary Wave III possibilities continuing to unfold with this recent sentiment shift in the stock market. And it gets better in terms of complexity, but I will save this for our next meeting.

Good investing all.

Captain Hook

Copyright 2007 www.treasurechests.info All rights reserved.

Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by www.treasurechests.info. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any purpose other than personal use. Therefore, reproduction, modification, storage in a retrieval system or retransmission, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise, for reasons other than personal use, is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.

Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilizing methods believed reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Comments within the text should not be construed as specific recommendations to buy or sell securities. Individuals should consult with their broker and personal financial advisors before engaging in any trading activities. We are not registered brokers or advisors. Certain statements included herein may constitute "forward-looking statements" with the meaning of certain securities legislative measures. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the above mentioned companies, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Do your own due diligence regarding investment decisions.